A step by
step approach to story development, from concept to completed story for
your novel or screenplay. More than 200 interactive Story Cards guide
you through the entire process.
powerful story structuring software available, Dramatica is driven by a
patented "Story Engine" that cross-references your dramatic
choices to ensure a perfect structure.
advanced screenwriting software available, Movie Magic is deemed a
"preferred file format" by the Writer's Guild. An industry
standard, MMS is used by professionals and studios around the world.
index cards - Name them, add notes, titles, colors, click and drag to
re-arrange, adjust font, save, export and print. An essential tool for
on Select Products
Are you a
student, teacher, or academic staffer? Get the very best price on select
products with these manufacturer sponsored academic discounts!
Deep Theme Theory
What we have done so far is describe the Elements of Theme. Now we have to put them in
motion as well.
The Thematic Argument
What moves Theme forward is the Thematic Argument. Why an argument? Because unless the
audience shares the author's bias on the story's issues, it will not accept a blanket
statement that the author's proposed way of dealing with a particular problem is the best.
The audience really does want to be convinced - it wants to learn something useful in real
life while being entertained at the same time. But, unless an author can successfully make
an emotional argument supporting his bias through his Theme, he will not be able to change
the heart of his audience.
Premise and the Thematic Argument
One of the most familiar attempts to describe the nature of the thematic argument relies
on a concept called the premise. A premise usually takes this form: Some
activity or character trait leads to a particular result or conclusion. An example of
this would be Greed leads to Self-Destruction. A premise can be very useful in
describing what a thematic argument is about in a nutshell, but provides very little
information about how that argument will proceed.
In regard to the example above, there are many ways in which greed might lead to
self-destruction. In addition, each of the four throughlines has its own view of the
thematic nature of the problem, so each one needs its own thematic argument. The
traditional premise looks at a story's Theme from one point of view only. If greed leads
to self-destruction, is this a problem for everyone, just for the Main Character, just the
Obstacle Character, or does it perhaps describe the nature and outcome of the relationship
between Main and Obstacle? We simply don't have enough information to determine that. As a
result, the traditional premise is fine for summing up a story, but does little to help an
author create a thematic argument.
Dramatica's view of a thematic argument begins not with a conflict - the thematic
conflict. Each of the throughlines has its own thematic conflict which we have already
described to some degree during our discussion of Range.
The Range itself forms one side of the thematic conflict and the Counterpoint forms the
other. As indicated earlier, you won't find Greed in Dramatica's thematic structure, but
you will find Self-Interest. The Counterpoint for Self-Interest is the dynamically opposed
to it in the chart, which is Morality. Thus, the premise of a thematic argument dealing
with Greed might begin with the conflict, Self-Interest vs. Morality.
The advantage of the thematic conflict is that it spells out both sides of the
thematic argument. Both Range and counterpoint must be played against one another over the
course of the story if the author is to make a case that one is better than the other.
The component of traditional premise which describes growth is reflected in the phrase
"leads to." In some cases this may also be "prevents,"
"creates," "hinders" or any other word or words that indicate the
relationship of the topic (such as Greed) to the conclusion (such as self-destruction).
Again, this describes what an audience comes to understand at the end of a story, but does
not give a clue about how to develop that understanding while creating a story.
Because it begins with a conflict rather than a topic, Dramatica's version of a thematic
argument supports an author creating as many scenes or events as he may choose in which
the Range is weighed against the Counterpoint. Each time the Range or Counterpoint is
illustrated it can be a shade of gray and does not have be shown in terms of all good vs.
all bad. Using our example from above, in a series of scenes Self-Interest might be shown
to be moderately positive, largely negative, slightly negative, then largely positive. At
the end of the story the audience can sum up or average out all the instances in which
they have seen.
Similarly, the counterpoint of Morality in its own scenes might be largely positive,
moderately positive, largely negative and largely negative again. At the end of the story
the audience will sum up the counterpoint and determine whether Morality by itself is a
positive or negative thing.
The audience does not consciously work out these averages. Rather, it is simply affected
by the ongoing layering of value judgments created by the author's bias. In fact, audience
members are constantly balancing the Range against the counterpoint in their hearts until
the story is over and they are left feeling more toward one or the other.
The advantage of this approach is that an author does not have to be heavy-handed by
saying only negative things about one side of the thematic conflict and only positive
things about the other. An audience will be much more open to a balanced emotional
argument where decisions are seldom black and white.
Finally, as reflected in traditional premise, an audience will want to see the ultimate
results of adhering to one value standard over another. In our example of Greed, it led to
Self-destruction. This is a generic conclusion. It could mean either a failure in one's
goals or a personal loss of the heart.
Dramatica sees goals and yearnings as two different things: one born of reason and one
born of emotion. How completely we achieve our goals determines our degree of
satisfaction. How well we accommodate our yearnings determines our degree of fulfillment.
So, one thing we need to know at the end of thematic argument is whether or not our goals
ended in success or failure, and also whether or not things feel good or bad.
The degree of success or failure, good or bad, is determined in storytelling. The thematic
appreciations of Success, Failure, Good, and Bad simply indicate on which side of the
fence the conclusion settled. As a result, there are two different aspects to the
conclusion of a Dramatica thematic argument -- the outcome (Success or Failure) and the
Judgment (Good or Bad).
From these considerations we can see that four broad conclusions to a thematic argument
1. The Success/Good conclusion or Happy Ending
2. The Failure/Bad conclusion or Tragedy
3. The Success/Bad conclusion or Personal Tragedy
4. The Failure/Good conclusion or Personal Triumph
It is important to note that a Failure/Good story, for example, does not mean the Failure
is Good but that in spite of a lack of satisfaction, the feel of the story is fulfilling.
Such is the case in the motion picture Rain Man in which Charlie (Tom Cruise) fails
to get the inheritance, yet overcomes his hatred of his father. This is a Personal
Similarly, Success/Bad stories are like Remains of the Day in which Mr. Stevens
(Anthony Hopkins) successfully maintains the household through thick and thin, yet in the
end finds himself empty and alone. This is a Personal Tragedy.
Sewing Together The Themes
In this section we have learned that the traditional premise is too blunt a tool to do
more than describe the gist of a finished work. In contrast, Dramatica's concept of a
thematic argument is explored through thematic conflict, development of the relative value
of different standards, and concluded with an assessment of both the level of satisfaction
and fulfillment. Such an approach is much more in line with the organic flow of a story's
emotional impact as felt through Theme, and is much more accessible as a creative
The Storyform: How Does All This Stuff Hold Together?
In our present exploration of Theme we are looking at Thematic Appreciations one by
one. From this point of view Appreciations can appear rather independent, with each
carrying its own meaning which needs to be determined and developed.
This point of view is deceptive, however. The meaning which Appreciations hold is partly
in their individuality and partly in their relationships to each other. The nature of any
single Appreciation has an impact on how to see every other Appreciation in that story.
All together, the collective impact of a specific arrangement of Appreciations describes
the underlying structure of a single complete story.
The connections these Appreciations have with one another is exceedingly complex. Beyond
the obvious links between such items as Domains/Concerns/ and Ranges, the web of dramatic
relationships between the Appreciations of a single story can only be kept fully
consistent using a computer.
The purpose of this section, The Elements of Structure, is just to catalogue the
pieces of story structure. The second half of this book, titled The Art of Storytelling,
will explore exactly how creating a story determines what relationships will exist between
that story's Appreciations.
Domain, Concern, Range, and Problem are not the only appreciations in Dramatica. In fact,
there are six other appreciations for each of the four throughlines, plus others that
affect the whole story. Whether or not an author consciously considers them while writing,
these appreciations will clearly appear in every complete story.
Additional Element Level Appreciations:
At the Element level where we already found each throughline's Problem, each of the four
throughlines also has three additional appreciations. Since each throughline has a
Problem, it is not surprising that each also has a Solution. The Solution is found
directly opposite the Problem in the thematic structure. For example, the Solution for too
much or too little logic is more or less feeling.
If a Problem were seen as a disease, its Solution would be a cure. A disease will also
have symptoms, and treatments for those symptoms. This is reflected in the same quad as
the Problem and Solution in each throughline, where one of the remaining Elements will be
the Focus (symptom) or Direction (treatment). The reason they are called Focus and
Direction is that characters, like real people, find their attention drawn to the
difficulties caused by a problem more than to the problem itself. Whether the Focus and
Direction we are considering falls in the Objective Story, Main, Obstacle, or Subjective
Story Throughline, they represent the symptoms of the Problem which draw attention (Focus)
and what the characters try to do about it (Direction).
In the Objective Story Throughline, the Focus is where all the characters concentrate, as
that is where their troubles are most apparent. The Direction is how they respond to try
and alleviate those troubles. If the story were a body with a disease (Problem), sometimes
a cure must be found and one must ignore the symptoms, not worry about a treatment, and
concentrate on a cure. Other times, the cure cannot be found, but if one simply treats the
symptoms, the body will recover enough to heal itself.
In the Main Character Throughline, the decision as to whether or not to change is
intimately tied to whether the Main Character is driven by the Focus toward a Direction of
effort, or whether he seeks the cure. The Main Character cannot tell which is the correct
approach, but a final decision at a leap of faith (or the more gradual shift from one
approach to the other) will ultimately determine whether the conclusion of the thematic
argument ends in Success or Failure and Good or Bad.
In the Obstacle Character Throughline, the Focus is where this character hopes to have the
greatest impact, and Direction is how he wants things to change as a result of that
Focus in the Subjective Story Throughline is the actual topic over which Main and Obstacle
Characters argue because it gets their attention. The audience will see the real Problem
between them, but the Main Character and Obstacle Character will only see the Focus.
Subjective Story Direction describes the direction in which the argument tends to lead.
Additional Variation Level Appreciations
At the Variation level each of the four throughlines has two additional appreciations.
They function roughly the same way in each throughline, but are most similar in between
the Main and Obstacle Character Throughlines and between Objective Story and Subjective
Both Main and Obstacle have a Unique Ability and a Critical Flaw. In the Main Character,
the Unique Ability represents some trait or quality that has the potential to allow that
character to resolve his Problem. The Critical Flaw, however, undermines that Unique
Ability. If the Main Character is ever to solve his troubles, he must overcome his
Critical Flaw in order to fully employ his Unique Ability.
Because the Obstacle Character is seen in terms of his impact, his Unique Ability
describes the quality he possesses that enables him to have a special impact on the Main
Character (in trying to change the Main Character's point of view). The Obstacle
Character's Critical Flaw is another quality that undermines that impact.
In the Objective Story and Subjective Story Throughlines, these same two items are better
described as the Catalyst and Inhibitor. Catalyst and Inhibitor act as the accelerator and
brake pedal on the forward progress of each throughline. In the Objective Story
Throughline, bringing in the Catalyst moves the plot forward more quickly, applying the
Inhibitor slows things down. This is a structural aid in pacing a story.
In the Subjective Story Throughline, Catalyst and Inhibitor control the rate at which the
relationship between Main and Obstacle Characters will develop. More Catalyst can bring a
confrontation to a head, more Inhibitor can delay it. Because Catalyst, Inhibitor, Range,
and counterpoint are all Variations, the proper choice of these items insures that the
pacing of the story will seem to come from inside the structure, rather than being
arbitrarily imposed by the author.
Additional Type Level Appreciations
At the Type level, each of the four throughlines has one additional appreciation. It is
called a Stipulation, because it stipulates how the growth of each throughline will make
itself known. The Stipulation provides a category in which the progress of each
throughline can be charted. For example, an Objective Story Stipulation of Obtaining might
be seen in the characters gathering cash receipts in their efforts to afford tuition. In
the Main Character Throughline, a Stipulation of Obtaining might be the unused concert
tickets on a shy man's bed stand from all the times he bought them but then was too afraid
to ask someone out to the show.
What about the Class level?
The Class level has no additional appreciations, since it only has four items and each is
already spoken for as the four Domains.
Is That About It?
Please keep in mind that this section of the Dramatica Theory Book deals with The Elements
Of Structure. It describes what the pieces are, not how to put them together. That comes
later in The Art Of Storytelling.
to the Next Section of the Book-->
How to Order Dramatica:
A New Theory of Story
the Table of Contents
Back to the Dramatica Home Page
Copyright 1996, Screenplay Systems, Inc.
The Dramatica theory was developed by
Melanie Anne Phillips and Chris Huntley
Chief Architect of the Dramatica software is Stephen
Dramatica is a registered trademark of Screenplay Systems Incorporated
the Dramatica Theory Home Page
Try Dramatica & StoryWeaver Risk
*Try either or both for 90 days. Not working for you?
Return for a full refund of your purchase price!
About Dramatica and
Hi, I'm Melanie Anne Phillips,
creator of StoryWeaver,
co-creator of Dramatica
and owner of Storymind.com. If you have a moment, I'd like to tell you
about these two story development tools - what each is designed to do, how
each works alone on a different part of story development and how they can be
used together to cover the entire process from concept to completion of your
novel or screenplay.
What They Do
Dramatica is a tool to help you
build a perfect story structure. StoryWeaver is a tool to help you build
your story's world. Dramatica focuses on the underlying logic of your
story, making sure there are no holes or inconsistencies. StoryWeaver
focuses on the creative process, boosting your inspiration and guiding it to add
depth, detail and passion to your story.
How They Do It
Dramatica has the world's only
patented interactive Story Engine™ which cross-references your answers to
questions about your dramatic intent, then finds any weaknesses in your
structure and even suggests the best ways to strengthen them.
StoryWeaver uses a revolutionary new
creative format as you follow more than 200 Story Cards™ step by step through
the story development process. You'll design the people who'll inhabit
your story's world, what happens to them, and what it all means.
How They Work
By itself Dramatic appeals to
structural writers who like to work out all the details of their stories
logically before they write a word. By itself, StoryWeaver appeals to
intuitive writers who like to follow their Muse and develop their stories as
But, the finished work of a
structural writer can often lack passion, which is where StoryWeaver can help.
And the finished work of an intuitive writer can often lack direction, which is
where Dramatica can help.
So, while each kind of writer will
find one program or the other the most initially appealing, both kinds of
writers can benefit from both programs.
Try Both Programs
We have a 90
Day Return Policy here at Storymind. Try either or both of these
products and if you aren't completely satisfied we'll cheerfully refund your
Complete Catalog of Products
the Writer's Survival Kit Bonus Package
FREE with ANY purchase!
A $300 Value!
step by step approach to story development, from concept to completed
story for your novel or screenplay. More than 200 interactive
Story Cards guide you through the entire process.
Pro - $179.95
2 Exclusive Bonuses! The
most powerful story structuring software available, Dramatica is driven
by a patented "Story Engine" that cross-references your
dramatic choices to ensure a perfect structure.
Writer's DreamKit - $49.95
brother to Dramatica Pro, Writer's DreamKit is built around the same
patented Story Engine - it just tracks fewer story points. So, you
develop the same solid story structure, just with fewer details.
Perfect for beginning writers or those new to Dramatica.
Structure - $149.95
all-in-one writing environment with built-in word processor that helps
you organize and cross-reference your story development materials.
INCLUDES DVD SET BONUS!
Writer - $99.95
brother of Power Structure includes the essential organization and word
processing tools writers need the most.
- Index Cards (Mac) - $19.95
index cards - add notes, titles, colors, click and drag to re-arrange.
An essential tool for every writer.
Magic Screenwriter - $149.95
advanced screenwriting software available, Movie Magic is deemed a
"preferred file format" by the Writer's Guild. An
industry standard, MMS is used by professionals and studios around the
Draft - $199.95
Magic Screenwriter, Final Draft is an industry standard, used by many
professional screenwriters and studios around the world.
The Lines (Macintosh) - $29.95
cost automatic screenplay formatter for Macintosh includes high-end
features such as interactive index cards linked to your script.
Hour Writing Course - $19.95
you need to know about story structure - twelve hours of video on a
single DVD - presented by Dramatica Theory co-creator, Melanie Anne
Software Companion - $19.95
four hours of video demonstrations of every key feature in Dramatica,
narrated by the co-creator of Dramatica.
Tips Book - $19.95
170 pages of
eye-opening essays on story structure, storytelling, finding inspiration
and a wide variety of writing techniques.
Seminar 8 DVD Set - $99.95
14 hours of
video from a live two day course taught by theory co-creator Melanie
Anne Phillips covering Dramatica story structure and StoryWeaver
Seminar Online - $49.95
The same 14
hour program presented in streaming video that you can view online or
download for a permanent copy.
Theory 2 Hour Audio Program - $19.95
concept in the Dramatica Theory of Story is fully explained in this
Characters of the Opposite Sex - $29.95
audio CD set that explains everything you need to know to create
characters of both sexes that ring absolutely true (and maybe even gain
insight into the communication problems in the real world!)
Storyteller Improves Your Writing - $29.95
better writing with this series of interactive exercises.
to Create Great Characters DVD - $19.95
A 90 minute
video program recorded during Dramatica co-creator Melanie Anne
Phillips' live in-person seminar on story structure and storytelling.
vs. Passion - Audio CD $19.95
Mind approach to writing uses your own passions to create your story's
structure. It focuses your efforts, clarifies the direction of
your story, and triggers your imagination.
with the Story Mind - Audio CD - $19.95
Learn how to
psychoanalyze your story's "mind" to uncover and treat
problems with characters, plot, theme, and genre.
Prices - Discounts on Select Products
Are you a
student, teacher, or academic staffer? Get the very best price on
select products with these manufacturer sponsored academic discounts!
Deals - Starting at $49.95
discounts with these bundles of our most popular writing products.
Survival Kit Bonus Package - FREE!
ANY purchase - Writing software, online writing workshops, writing
seminars on video, story theory book, and much, MUCH more!