{"id":250,"date":"2013-04-04T14:26:25","date_gmt":"2013-04-04T21:26:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/?p=250"},"modified":"2018-08-21T12:18:39","modified_gmt":"2018-08-21T19:18:39","slug":"a-few-words-about-theme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/a-few-words-about-theme\/","title":{"rendered":"A Few Words About Theme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last twenty-<wbr \/>five years, I\u2019ve written thousands of articles on story structure and storytelling. \u00a0Here, I\u2019ve gathered together a few of the best on the topic of theme. \u00a0I hope you find them illuminating in concept and practical in application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Coming Apart at the Themes<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Even when a story has memorable characters, a riveting plot and a fully developed genre, it may still be coming apart at the themes.<\/p>\n<p>Theme is perhaps the most powerful, yet least understood element of story structure. It is powerful because theme is an emotional argument: It speaks directly to the heart of the reader or audience. It is least understood because of its intangible nature, working behind the scenes, and between the lines.<\/p>\n<p>When mis-<wbr \/>used, theme can become a ham-<wbr \/>handed moral statement in black and white, alienating the reader\/audience with its dogmatic pontifications. When properly used, theme can add richness, nuance, and meaning to a story that would otherwise be no more than a series of events.<\/p>\n<p>In this article, we\u2019ll separate the elements of theme by their dramatic functions so we can understand the parts. Then we\u2019ll learn how to combine them together into a strong message that is greater than the sum of the parts.<\/p>\n<p>What do we really mean by the word, \u201ctheme?\u201d In fact, \u201ctheme\u201d has two meanings. The first meaning is not unlike that of a teacher telling a class to write a theme paper. We\u2019ve all received assignments in school requiring us to express our thoughts about \u201chow we spent our summer vacation,\u201d or \u201cthe impact of industrialization on 19th century cultural morality,\u201d or \u201cdeath.\u201d Each of these \u201cthemes\u201d is a topic, nothing more, and nothing less. It functions to describe the subject matter that will be explored in the work, be it a paper, novel, stage play, teleplay, or movie.<\/p>\n<p>Every story needs a thematic topic to help hold the overall content of the story together, to act as a unifying element through which the plot unfolds and the characters grow. In fact, you might look at the thematic topic as the growth medium in which the story develops. Although an interesting area to explore, the real focus of this article is on the other element of theme.<\/p>\n<p>This second aspect of theme is the message or premise of your story. A premise is a moral statement about the value of or troubles caused by an element of human character. For example, some common premises include, \u201cGreed leads to Self-<wbr \/>Destruction,\u201d and \u201cTrue love overcomes all obstacles.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A story without a premise seems pointless, but a story with an overstated message comes off as preachy. While a premise is a good way to understand what a story is trying to prove, it provides precious little help on how to go about proving it.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s begin by examining the components of \u201cpremise\u201d and then laying out a sure-<wbr \/>fire method for developing an emotional argument that will lead your reader or audience to the moral conclusions of your story without hitting them over the head.<\/p>\n<p>All premises grow from character. Usually, the premise revolves around the Main Character. In fact, we might define the Main Character as the one who grapples with the story\u2019s moral dilemma.<\/p>\n<p>A Main Character\u2019s moral dilemma may be a huge issue, such as the ultimate change in Scrooge when he leaves behind his greedy ways and becomes a generous, giving person. Or, the dilemma may be small, as when Luke Skywalker finally gains enough faith in himself to turn off the targeting computer and trust his own instincts in the original Star Wars movie (Episode IV). Either way, if the premise isn\u2019t there at all, the Main Character will seem more like some guy dealing with issues, than an example in human development from whom we can learn.<\/p>\n<p>Traditionally, premises such as these are stated in the form, \u201cThis leads to That.\u201d In the examples above, the premises would be \u201cGreed leads to Self Destruction,\u201d and \u201cTrusting in Oneself leads to Success.\u201d The Point of each premise is the human quality being explored: \u201cGreed\u201d in the case of Scrooge and \u201cSelf Trust\u201d with Luke.<\/p>\n<p>We can easily see these premises in A Christmas Carol and Star Wars, but what if you were simply given either of them and told to write a story around them? Premises are great for boiling a story\u2019s message down to its essence, but are not at all useful for figuring out how to develop a message in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>So how do we create a theme in a way that will guide us in how to develop it in our story, and also sway our audience without being overbearing? First, we must add something to the traditional \u201cThis leads to That\u201d form of the premise. Beside having a thematic Point like \u201cGreed\u201d we\u2019re going to add a Counterpoint \u2013 the opposite of the point \u2013 in this case, \u201cGenerosity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Arguing to your audience that Greed is Bad creates a one-<wbr \/>sided argument. But arguing the relative merits of Greed vs. Generosity provides both sides of the argument and lets your audience decide for itself. Crafting such an argument will lead your reader or audience to your conclusions without forcing it upon them. Therefore, you will be more likely to convince them rather than having them reject your premise as a matter of principle, making themselves impervious to your message rather than swallowing it whole.<\/p>\n<p>To create such an argument, follow these steps:<\/p>\n<p>1. Determine what you want your story\u2019s message to be<\/p>\n<p>We all have human qualities we admire and others we despise. Some might be as large as putting oneself first no matter how much damage it does to others. Some might be as small as someone who borrows things and never gets around to returning them. Regardless, your message at this stage will simply take the form, \u201cHuman Quality X is Bad,\u201d or \u201cHuman Quality Y is Good.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>If you are going to create a message that is passionate, look to what truly irks you, or truly inspires you, and select that human quality to give to your Main Character. Then, you\u2019ll find it far easier to come up with specific examples of that quality to include in your story, and you will write about it with vigor.<\/p>\n<p>This is your chance to get up on the soapbox. Don\u2019t waste it on some grand classic human trait that really means nothing to you personally. Pick something you really care about and sound off by showing how that trait ennobles or undermines your Main Character.<\/p>\n<p>As a last resort, look to your characters and plot and let them suggest your thematic point. See what kinds of situations are going to arise in your story; what kinds of obstacles will be faced. Think of the human qualities that would make the effort to achieve the story\u2019s goal the most difficult, exacerbate the obstacles, and gum up the works. Give that trait to your Main Character, and you\u2019ll be pleasantly surprised to see it take on a life of its own.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, you may already know your message before you even get started. You may, in fact, have as your primary purpose in creating the story the intent to make a point about a particular human quality.<\/p>\n<p>No matter how you come up with your message, once you have it, move on to step 2.<\/p>\n<p>2. Determine your Counterpoint.<\/p>\n<p>As described earlier, the Counterpoint is the opposite of the Point. So, if your story\u2019s message is \u201cBeing Closed-<wbr \/>Minded is Bad,\u201d then your Point is \u201cBeing Closed Minded,\u201d and your Counterpoint is \u201cBeing Open Minded.\u201d \u00a0Similarly, if your message is \u201cBorrowing things from others and not returning them is Bad,\u201d then your counter point is \u201cBorrowing things from other and returning them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Note that we didn\u2019t include the value judgment part of the message (i.e. \u201cGood\u201d or \u201cBad\u201d) as part of the point or counterpoint. The idea is to let the audience arrive at that conclusion for themselves. The point and counterpoint simply show both sides of the argument. Our next step will be to work out how we are going to lead the audience to come to the conclusion we want them to have.<\/p>\n<p>3. Show how well the Point does vs. the Counterpoint.<\/p>\n<p>The idea here is to see each of the two human qualities (point and counterpoint) in action in your story to illustrate how well each one fares. To this end, come up with as many illustrations as you can of each.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in A Christmas Carol, we see scrooge deny an extension on a loan, refuse to allow Cratchet a piece of coal, decline to make a donation to the poor. Each of these moments fully illustrates the impact of the thematic point of \u201cGreed.\u201d Similarly, in the same story, we see Feziwhig spending his money for a Christmas Party for his employees, Scrooge\u2019s nephew inviting him to dinner, and Cratchet giving of his time to Tiny Tim. Generosity is seen in action as well.<\/p>\n<p>Each instance of Greed propagates ill feelings. Each instance of Generosity propagates positive feelings. As the illustrations layer upon one another over the course of the story, the emotional argument is made that Greed is not a positive trait, whereas Generosity is.<\/p>\n<p>4. Avoid comparing the Point and Counterpoint directly.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the greatest mistake in making a thematic argument is to directly compare the relative value of the point and counterpoint. If this is done, it takes all decision away from the audience and puts it right in the hands of the author. \u00a0The effect is to have the author repeatedly saying, \u201cGenerosity is better than Greed\u2026 Generosity is better than Greed,\u201d like a sound loop.<\/p>\n<p>A better way is to show Greed at work in its own scenes, and Generosity at work in completely different scenes. In this manner, the audience is left to drawn its own conclusions. And while showing Greed as always wholly bad and Generosity as always wholly good may create a rather melodramatic message, at least the audience won\u2019t feel as if you\u2019ve crammed it down its throat!<\/p>\n<p>5. Shade the degree that Point and Counterpoint are Good or Bad.<\/p>\n<p>Because you are going to include multiple instances or illustrations of the goodness or badness or your point and counter point, you don\u2019t have to try to prove your message completely in each individual scene.<\/p>\n<p>Rather, let the point be really bad sometimes, and just a little negative others. In this manner, Greed may start out a just appearing to be irritating, but by the end of the story may affect life and death issues. Or, Greed may be as having devastating effects, but ultimately only be a minor thorn in people\u2019s sides. And, of course, you may choose to jump around, showing some examples of major problems with Greed and others that see it in not so dark a light. Similarly, not every illustration of your Counterpoint has to carry the same weight.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, the audience will subconsciously average together all of the illustrations of the point, and also average together all the illustrations of the counterpoint, and arrive at a relative value of one to the other.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if you create an arbitrary scale of +5 down to &#8211;<wbr \/>5 to assign a value of being REALLY Good (+5) or REALLY Bad (-<wbr \/>5), Greed might start out at &#8211;<wbr \/>2 in one scene, be &#8211;<wbr \/>4 in other, and &#8211;<wbr \/>1 in a third. The statement here is that Greed is always bad, but not totally AWFUL, just bad.<\/p>\n<p>Then, you do the same with the counterpoint. Generosity starts out as a +4, then shows up as a +1, and finally ends up as a +3. This makes the statement that Generosity is Good. Not the end-<wbr \/>all of the Greatest Good, but pretty darn good!<\/p>\n<p>At the end of such a story, instead of making the blanket statement that Greed is Bad and Generosity is Good, you are simply stating that Generosity is better than Greed. That is a lot easier for an audience to accept, since human qualities in real life are seldom all good or all bad.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/storymind.com\/storyweaverad.htm\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"3416\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/finding-your-creative-time\/storyweaver-article-in-line-ad\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"253,407\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;Melanie Hillman&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1534255681&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"StoryWeaver Article In-line Ad\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad-186x300.jpg\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad.jpg\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-3416\" src=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"253\" height=\"407\" srcset=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad.jpg 253w, https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad-93x150.jpg 93w, https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/StoryWeaver-Article-In-line-Ad-186x300.jpg 186w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 253px) 100vw, 253px\" \/><\/a>But there is more you can do with this. What if Generosity is mostly good, but occasionally has negative effects? Suppose you show several scenes illustrating the impact of Generosity, but in one of them, someone is going to share his meal, but in the process, drops the plate, the food is ruined, and no one gets to eat. Well, in that particular case, Greed would have at least fed one of them! So, you might rate that scene on your arbitrary scale as a &#8211;<wbr \/>2 for Generosity.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, Greed might actually be shown as slightly Good in a scene. But at the end of the day, all of the instances of Greed still add up to a negative. For example, scene one of Greed might be a &#8211;<wbr \/>4, scene two a +2 and scene three a &#8211;<wbr \/>5. Add them together and Greed comes out to be a &#8211;<wbr \/>7 overall. And that is how the audience will see it as well.<\/p>\n<p>This approach gives us the opportunity to do some really intriguing things in our thematic argument. What if both Greed and Generosity were shown to be bad, overall? By adding up the numbers of the arbitrary scale, you could argue that every time Greed is used, it causes problems, but ever time Generosity is used, it also causes problems. But in the end, Greed is a &#8211;<wbr \/>12 and Generosity is only a &#8211;<wbr \/>3, proving that Generosity, in this case, is the lesser of two evils.<\/p>\n<p>Or what if they both added up Good in the end? Then your message might be that Generosity is the greater of two goods! But they could also end up equally bad, or equally good (Greed at &#8211;<wbr \/>3 and Generosity at &#8211;<wbr \/>3, for example). This would be a message that in this story\u2019s particular situations, being Greedy or Generous doesn\u2019t really matter, either way; you\u2019ll make the situation worse.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, both might end up with a rating of zero, making the statement that neither Greed nor Generosity has any real impact on the situation, in the end.<\/p>\n<p>Now, you have the opportunity to create dilemmas for your Main Character that are far more realistic and far less moralistic. And by having both point and counterpoint spend some time in the Good column and some time in the Bad column over the course of your story, you are able to mirror the real life values of our human qualities and their impact on those around us.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>What, Exactly, Is Theme?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It seems every author is aware of theme, but try to find one who can define it! Most will tell you theme has something to do with the mood or feel of a story. But how does that differ fromgenre? Others will say that theme is the message of the story. Some will put forth that theme is the\u00a0premise\u00a0of a story that illustrates the results of certain kinds of behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Taking each of these a bit farther, a story\u2019s mood or feel might be \u201canger\u201d. A message might be \u201cnuclear power plants are bad\u201d. A premise could be \u201cgreed leads to self-<wbr \/>destruction.\u201d Clearly each of these might show up in the very same story, and each has a somewhat thematic feel to it. But just as certainly, none of them feels complete by itself. This is because each is just a different angle on what theme really is.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, theme is perspective. Perspective is relationship. Theme describes the\u00a0relationshipbetween what is being looked at and from where it is being seen. This is why theme has traditionally been so hard to describe. It is not an independent thing like plot or character, but is a relationship\u00a0between\u00a0plot and character.<\/p>\n<p>As a familiar example, think of the old adage about three blind men trying to describe an elephant. Each is like a character in a story, and their investigation of the beast is like the plot. One, feeling the tail comments, \u201cIt is long and thin like a snake.\u201d Another, feeling the ear replies, \u201cNo, it is wide and flat like a jungle leaf.\u201d The final investigator feels the leg and retorts, \u201cYou are both wrong! It is round and stout like a tree.\u201d How each of those men\u00a0felt\u00a0about the elephant, how they\u00a0understood\u00a0it, depended upon his point of view, and the fact that it was an elephant. It is also true, that had another animal been the object of study, the perspective would have changed as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Theme: An Emotional Argument<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">It is one thing to tell your audience, \u201cGreed leads to self-<wbr \/>destruction.\u201d It is another thing to prove it! Using a premise as the basis for your theme provides you with clear idea of what you hope to say, but it provides precious little guidance in how to say it.<\/p>\n<p>You should focus on the Emotional Argument as the way to prove your point without resorting to cut-<wbr \/>and-<wbr \/>dried, ham-<wbr \/>handed, generalizations and platitudes. Here\u2019s how it works:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGreed,\u201d in our example premise, does not really stand alone, but has a counter-<wbr \/>point of \u201cGenerosity.\u201d Although the focus of our story will be on Greed, by also showing the contrasting impact of Generosity, we create a thematic conflict pitting point against counter-<wbr \/>point.<\/p>\n<p>In our story, act by act, we need to explore both point and counterpoint several times to see the relative worth of each. BUT, we should never compare both DIRECTLY. Rather, the thematic point should be explored on several occasions to see how it fares. Interwoven in other scenes or moments, the counterpoint needs to be separately explored to see how it fares on its own. As the story progresses, the audience will begin to tally-<wbr \/>up the independent value of each, averaging its benefits with its drawbacks. By the end of the story, when all examples of the worth of both point and counter-<wbr \/>point have been presented, the audience will arrive at an emotional conclusion that one is better than the other.<\/p>\n<p>For example, Greed may seem to have a greatly negative impact in its first appearance, but slightly positive results in its second. A third appearance might see it as being neutral. Overall, the average of all three appearances rates it as slightly negative.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, Generosity might appear ALSO greatly negative at first, then highly positive, then slightly positive. In the end, it averages out as slightly positive. The conclusion for the audience is that Greed is somewhat worse than Generosity.<\/p>\n<p>Emotions don\u2019t see things as black and white. By avoiding the simple blanket statement made by a premise and \u201carguing\u201d the relative worth of point and counter-<wbr \/>point over the course of your story, you will create an \u201cemotional argument\u201d which will sway your audience to your point of view, rather than trying to hit it over the head.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Both Sides of the Thematic Argument<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Every powerful theme pits a \u201cMessage Issue\u201d against a \u201cCounterpoint\u201d, such as \u201cGreed vs. Generosity\u201d, or \u201cHolding On To Hope\u201d vs. \u201cAbandoning Hope\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Message Issue and Counterpoint define the thematic argument of your story. They play both sides of the moral dilemma. The most important key to a successful thematic argument is never, ever play the message issue and counterpoint together at the same time.<\/p>\n<p>Why? Because the thematic argument is an emotional one, not one of reason. You are trying to sway your reader\/audience to adopt your moral view as an author. This will not happen if you keep showing one side of the argument as \u201cgood\u201d and the other side as \u201cbad\u201d in direct comparison. Such a thematic argument would seem one-<wbr \/>sided, and treat the issues as being black-<wbr \/>and-<wbr \/>white, rather than gray-<wbr \/>scale.<\/p>\n<p>In real life, moral decisions are seldom cut-<wbr \/>and-<wbr \/>dried. Although we may hold views that are clearly defined, in practice it all comes down to the context of the specific situation. For example, it may be wrong to steal in general. But, it might be proper to steal from the enemy during a war, or from a large market when you baby is starving. In the end, all moral views become a little blurry around the edges when push comes to shove.<\/p>\n<p>Statements of absolutes do not a thematic argument make. Rather, your most powerful message will deal with the lesser of two evils, the greater of two goods, or the degree of goodness or badness of each side of the argument. In fact, there are often situations where both sides of the moral argument are equally good, equally bad, or that both sides are either good nor bad in the particular situation being explored in the story.<\/p>\n<p>The way to create this more powerful, more believable, and more persuasive thematic argument is as follows:<\/p>\n<p>1. Determine in advance whether each side is good, bad, or neutral.<\/p>\n<p>Do this by assigning an arbitrary \u201cvalue\u201d to both the Message Issue and the Counterpoint. For example, we might choose a scale with +5 being absolutely good, &#8211;<wbr \/>5 being absolutely bad, and zero being neutral.<\/p>\n<p>If our thematic argument is Greed vs. Generosity, then Greed (our Message Issue) might be a &#8211;<wbr \/>3, and Generosity (our Counterpoint) might be a &#8211;<wbr \/>2. This would mean that both Greed and Generosity are both bad (being in the negative) but that Generosity is a little less bad than Greed since Generosity is only a &#8211;<wbr \/>2 and Greed is a &#8211;<wbr \/>3.<\/p>\n<p>2. Show the good and bad aspects of both the Message Issue and the Counterpoint.<\/p>\n<p>Make sure the examples of each side of the thematic argument that you have already developed don\u2019t portray either side as being all good or all bad. In fact, even if one side of the argument turns out to be bad in the end, it might be shown as good initially. But over the course of the story, that first impression is changed by seeing that side in other contexts.<\/p>\n<p>3. Have the good and bad aspects \u201caverage out\u201d to the thematic conclusion you want.<\/p>\n<p>By putting each side of the thematic argument on a roller coaster of good and bad aspects, it blurs the issues, just as in real life. But the reader\/audience will \u201caverage out\u201d all of their exposures to each side of the argument and draw their own conclusions at the end of the story.<\/p>\n<p>In this way, the argument will move out of the realm of intellectual consideration and become a viewpoint arrived by feel. And, since you have not only shown both sides, but the good and the bad of each side, your message will be easier to swallow. And finally, since you never directly compared the two sides, the reader\/audience will not feel that your message has been shoved down its throat.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>\u201cPremise\u201d Leads to Lack of Conflict<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Many authors have been taught that a meaningful story must have a premise in the form of \u201cSome human quality leads (or does not lead) to a particular inevitable conclusion.\u201d Such a premise might be \u201cGreed (human quality) leads to Self destruction (inevitable conclusion).\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One problem with the premise concept is that it contains no built-<wbr \/>in conflict. Rather, it simply presents a starting point, an ending point, and a non-<wbr \/>specific path that might be anything at all.<\/p>\n<p>Adding conflict to your premise can provide a driving force to help move your theme through the \u201cleads to\u201d to the conclusion. To add conflict to a premise, consider the human quality stated in the beginning of the premise. In our example, this was \u201cgreed.\u201d Next, determine the \u201copposite\u201d of greed, which might be \u201cgenerosity.\u201d Now, restate the beginning of your premise as \u201cGreed vs. Generosity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>We have now created a thematic conflict between two opposing human qualities, rather than simply exploring the one. But, of course, if we left things in this condition the overall premise would not read very well: \u201cGreed vs. Generosity leads to Self Destruction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Since we are now examining the relative value of two alternative thematic approaches to life, we must also provide a judgment as to the outcome of each approach. So, we might say that \u201cWhen Greed vs. Generosity, Greed will result in Self Destruction while Generosity leads to Success.\u201d Now we have a premise full of potential conflict and a comparative conclusion that brings the audience to think, rather than to simply accept the inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Generosity might also lead to Self Destruction in a particular story, illustrating that sometimes there is no way out. Or, Generosity might lead to Love, or Wealth, putting a different spin on the \u201cproof.\u201d It also might be shown that Greed leads to the favorable conclusion, while Generosity is Self Destructive. (For an example of this kind of approach, even though it deals with other thematic issues, view Woody Allen\u2019s \u201cCrimes and Misdemeanors.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>There is much more that can be done with a premise to not only provide conflict, but create a complete thematic argument that works with an audience\u2019s heart, rather than through its intellect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Theme: What Are You Talking About?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Without theme, a story is just a series of events that proceeds logistically and ends up one way or another. Theme is what gives it all meaning. When encoded into a story, theme will not be a universal meaning for all things, but a smaller truth pertaining to the\u00a0proper\u00a0way of dealing with a\u00a0particular\u00a0situation. In a sense, the encoding of theme moves the emotional argument of the story from the general to the specific. It the argument is made strongly enough, it may influence attitudes in areas far beyond the specific, but to be made strongly, it must limit its scope to precise encoding.<\/p>\n<p>If our thematic conflict is Morality vs. Self-<wbr \/>interest, for example, it would be a mistake to try and argue that Morality is\u00a0always\u00a0better than Self-<wbr \/>Interest. In fact, there would be few people whose life experience would not tell them that sometimes Self-<wbr \/>Interest is the better of the two. Keep in mind here that Dramatica defines Morality as \u201cDoing for others with no regard for self\u201d and Self-<wbr \/>Interest as \u201cDoing for self with no regard for others.\u201d This doesn\u2019t mean a Self-<wbr \/>Interested person is out hurt to others, but simply that what happens to others, good or bad, is not even a consideration.<\/p>\n<p>As an example, Morality might be better if one has plenty of food to share during a harsh winter and does so. Morality might be worse if one subjugates one\u2019s life rather than displease one\u2019s peers. Self-<wbr \/>Interest might be better if a crazed maniac is charging at you and you kill him with an ax. Self-<wbr \/>Interest might be bad if you won\u2019t share the last of the penicillin in case you might need it later. It really all depends on the context.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Unfolding Your Thematic Topic<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The thematic topic is the subject matter of your story, such as \u201cdeath,\u201d or \u201cman\u2019s inhumanity to man.\u201d No matter what topic you will be exploring, it will contain large issues, small issues, and everything in between.<\/p>\n<p>In Act One, you need to introduce and establish your theme so that your readers or audience gets a sense of the kinds of issues you\u2019ll be exploring. To do this, you have three different approaches available.<\/p>\n<p>1. You could outline the scope of your subject matter with one or more large, definitive dramatic moments. Then, in acts two and three, you would gradually fill in smaller and smaller details, adding nuance and shading to the overall topic as the story progresses. This system is best when trying to apply topics that are often seen objectively or impersonally to everyday life.<\/p>\n<p>2. Conversely, you could begin with the details in Act One, then move to larger concerns as the story progresses. This is a good way to elevate topics dealing with commonplace, mundane, or work-<wbr \/>a-<wbr \/>day issues to philosophical or global importance.<\/p>\n<p>3. Finally, you could mix it up, presenting a blend of issues ranging from the large to the small in every act. This creates a feeling that the topic is an area to explore, rather than a statement to be understood.<\/p>\n<p>Whichever approach you take, the pattern needs to be set up in Act One so your reader or audience can follow. So determine which approach you wish to take and then create specific examples that illustrate your topic, both in a large and small way.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, pepper these examples into each act as the scope of your topic broadens, narrows, or contrasts the two extremes as it goes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Postscript<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I hope you have enjoyed these articles on theme. \u00a0If so, please stop by my web site at Storymind.com for many more. \u00a0And while you are there, try free demos of our software products for writers to help you develop your story\u2019s world, who\u2019s in it, what happens to them, and what it all means.<\/p>\n<p>Melanie Anne Phillips<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">A Few Words About Theme<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Copyright Melanie Anne Phillips<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Published by Storymind Press<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Visit us at Storymind.com<\/p>\n<p id=\"obi_random_banners_posts\" class=\"obi_random_banners_posts\"><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Man-Made-First-Hour-Event-ebook\/dp\/B09WYXMFBV\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Screenshot-2023-11-27-3.58.58-PM.png\" class=\"aligncenter\"><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last twenty-five years, I\u2019ve written thousands of articles on story structure and storytelling. \u00a0Here, I\u2019ve gathered together a few of the best on the topic of theme. \u00a0I hope you find them illuminating in concept and practical in application. Coming Apart at the Themes Even when a story has memorable characters, a riveting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theme"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p36xpN-42","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3438,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions\/3438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}