![\"\"](\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/arhcetypes.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Archetypal characters have a bad name.\u00a0 Many writers think such characters are two-dimensional stick figures that come off more like plot robots than real people.\u00a0 But the truth is that archetypes represent essential human qualities that need to be explored in every story, such as trying to solve the story’s problems through logic as opposed to another character who hopes to succeed by following his or her heart.\u00a0 The story’s message is which approach turns out to be the best one in regard to the particular predicament explored in the story.<\/p>\n
So if these archetypal human qualities need to be explored, how can you write a plot in which the characters that represent these attributes come off as flesh-and-blood, rather than automatons?<\/p>\n
To find out, let’s build a plot using only archetypal characters.\u00a0 For this exercise I’ll be using the eight archetypal character described in\u00a0 the Dramatica approach story story structure that I co-developed along with my writing partner many years ago.\u00a0 You can, of course, use any archetypal system that is comfortable for you, such as those of Campbell or Jung.<\/p>\n
To build our sample story, let’s take each archetype one by one and see how each can add the potential for interpersonal conflict and internal conflict as well.<\/p>\n
Everyone is familiar with the Protagonist archetype, so let’s begin there and arbitrarily create a PROTAGONIST called Jane. Jane wants to\u2026 what?\u2026 rob a bank?\u2026kill the monster?\u2026 stop the terrorists?\u2026 resolve her differences with her mother? It really doesn\u2019t matter for our sample story; her goal can be whatever interests us as authors. So we\u2019ll pick \u201cstop the terrorists\u201d because it interests us. All right, our Protagonist \u2014 Jane \u2014 wants to stop the terrorists.<\/p>\n
Our Dramatica approach says we also need an ANTAGONIST. Antagonist by our definition is the person who tries to prevent achievement of the goal. So, who might be diametrically against the completion of the task Jane wants to accomplish? The Religious Leader whose dogma is the source of inspiration that spawns the acts of terror?\u2026 The multinational business cartel that stands to make billions if the terrorists succeed in their scheme?\u2026 Her former lover who leads the terrorist who are really an elite band of criminals? We like THAT one! Okay, we have our Protagonist (Jane) who wants to stop the terrorists who are led by her former lover (Johann).<\/p>\n
Two simple Characters down, six to go. Dramatica now tells us we need a SKEPTIC. So who might be doubtful of the effort and not believe that success is possible for our\u00a0 stalwart Jane? Perhaps a rival special agent who doesn\u2019t want to be left in the dust by her glowing success?\u2026 Maybe her current love interest on the force who feels Jane is in over her head?\u2026 Her father, the Senator, who wants his daughter to follow him into politics? Good enough for us. So we have Jane who wants to stop the terrorists, pitted against her former lover Johann who heads the criminal band, and opposed by her father, the Senator.<\/p>\n
To balance the Skeptic, we\u2019re going to need a SIDEKICK is, by definition, has complete unshakable faith in the Protagonist. We could bring back the idea of using her current lover but this<\/em> time have him knowing how much ridding the world of scum appeals to Jane so he remains steadfastly behind her. Or we might employ her Supervisor and mentor on the force who knows the depth of Jane\u2019s talent, wants to inspire other young idealists to take action against threats to democracy, or prove his theories and vindicate his name in the undercover world\u2026 We\u2019ll use the Supervisor. So here\u2019s Jane who wants to stop the terrorists, pitted against her former lover Johann, the head of the band, who wants to stop her, opposed by her father, the Senator, and supported by her Supervisor.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s bring in a CONTAGONIST.\u00a0 What’s a Contagonist, you ask?\u00a0 It’s an archetypal character we developed uniquely in Dramatica.\u00a0 Essentially, they gum up the works.\u00a0 Sometimes they act as tempation to lure the protagonist off the proper path.\u00a0 And other times they gum up the works by doing or saying something that creates problems for the Protagonist, often quite by accident.<\/p>\n Here are some possible Contagonists for our sample story: the Seasoned Cop who says, \u201cYou have to play by the rules\u201d and thwarts Jane\u2019s efforts to forge a better approach?\u2026 Or, the Ex-Con with a heart of gold who studies the classics and counsels her to base her approach on proven scenarios rather than her own inspirations?\u2026 Or, her friend Sheila, a computer whiz who has a bogus response plan based on averaging every scenario every attempted? Computer whiz it is. So Jane wants to stop the terrorists, is pitted against the head of the band (her former lover Johann) who wants to stop her, opposed by her father, the Senator, supported by her Supervisor, and tempted away from the strength of her own inspired approach by her friend Sheila, the computer whiz.<\/p>\n Keeping in mind the concept that for every archetype there should be another one who represents the opposite human quality, we are going to want to balance the Contagonist (who tempts and gums up the works) with a Guardian archetype (who appeals to conscience and smooths the way).<\/p>\n We might go with a Master of the Oriental martial arts who urges her to \u201cgo with the flow\u201d (\u201cUse The Force, Jane!\u201d)?\u2026 The Ex-Con again who says, \u201cGet back to basics\u201d?\u2026 or perhaps the Seasoned Cop who paves the way through the undercover jungle?\u2026. We like the Seasoned Cop. Note that we could have used him as Contagonist who says “You have to play by the rules,” but elected to use him as Guardian instead, who paves the way for Jane by giving her the benefit of his experience. As you can see it\u2019s totally up to us as authors which characteristics go into which players. Jane wants to stop the terrorists, is pitted against the head of the band (her former lover Johann) who wants to stop her, is opposed by her father, the Senator, supported by her Supervisor, tempted by her friend Sheila the computer whiz, and protected by the Seasoned Cop.<\/p>\n The final two archetypal characters in our Dramatica system represent our intellect and our passion, respectively.\u00a0 Since we really like some of the character we came up with earlier but not to use, let\u2019s bring back the Ex-Con as REASON, stressing the need to use classic scenarios. We\u2019ll balance her with the Master of the Oriental martial arts, who maintains Jane\u2019s need to break with the Western approach by letting loose and following her feelings.<\/p>\n Well, that covers all eight Archetypal Characters: Protagonist, Antagonist, Skeptic, Sidekick, Contagonist, Guardian, Reason and Emotion. So now we end up with Jane who wants to stop the terrorists and is pitted against the head of the band (her former lover Johann) who wants to stop her, is opposed by her Father, the Senator, is supported by her Supervisor, tempted by her friend Sheila the computer whiz, protected by the Seasoned Cop, urged by the Ex-Con to copy the classics, and counseled by the Master of Oriental martial arts to let loose and follow her feelings.<\/p>\n As was pointed out at the beginning, you can use any archetypal characters you like, and simply applying the human quality they represent to their plot function, they will have the potential not only to come off as real people but to lay the groundwork for conflict within themselves and with the other characters as well.<\/p>\n You can learn more about the Dramatica approach to archetypes by downloading a free PDF version of Dramatica: A New Theory of Story<\/a>, and you can put it to work with our Dramatica Story Structure Software<\/a>, which you can try risk-free for 90 days.<\/p>\nCreating a Contagonist<\/h3>\n
Creating a Guardian<\/h3>\n
Creating Reason and Emotion Characters<\/h3>\n
![](\"https:\/\/storymind.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Screenshot-2023-11-27-3.58.58-PM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"