Transcripts of the personal tapes
recorded by Melanie Anne Phillips while continuing to develop the Mental Relativity theory
"Space, Time, and
the Size of Mind Constant"
July 9, 1994, Saturday.
It occurs to me as we're working towards the
unified field theory we have a description in our model, what makes it unified is that it
describes the way linearity relates to relativity. Relativity being holistic in nature,
has no linear connection with anything because everything is holistically connected.
Whereas in linearity there is no relative nature and the closest you can get is
non-linearity, which creates fractals.
When you get fractals, that's when you're coming
from linearity and creating space. When you're trying to reach linearity from relativity,
from a holism, you create frictals which are the dynamic record of the interaction of
order and chaos. In effect, what it's saying is that space and time, neither of those
actually exist in the universe external.
The universe external only has mass and energy and
when you look at it from a linear side, you can say that mass and energy then is turned
into an appreciation, a perception that we call space and time through a linear process
that generates those two non-linear and relativistic appreciations of space and time. But
they can both be created out of linearity, requiring that there be no existing space nor
existing time in the external universe. Only mass and energy and the interactions between
the two create a linearity that generates the non-linear and the relativistic.
When you look at it from the other side, from the
internal perspective, you look at the mind per se and say that only space and time exist.
There is no such thing as mass and energy, discounting the entire external universe
itself. The way that our appreciation of what is mass and what is energy, that there are
such things and that they are external to ourselves is a natural process by the
interaction of space and time. And when we take space and time through the relativistic,
the interaction of the relativistic with the non-linear, we end up creating an
approximation of linearity which requires both the point and the vector and that is what
creates the appreciation of mass and energy external to ourselves.
So through that notion, clearly it can be seen that
from the perspective of the mind, only the mind exists and the universe is a fabrication;
from the perspective of the universe, only the universe exists and the mind is a
fabrication which leads to the Taoist philosophy of all being nothing and nothing being
all. It also leads to the concept of particle and wave because it means that we see
something that exists that is a true paradox: from one perspective the second one doesn't
exist, and when we go to the second one, adopt that perspective, the first one doesn't
exist. That is one of those strange mathematical phenomena, strange loops which is making
its way into Loop-theory and String-theory and Chaos-theory and in fact, as long as we try
to resolve the strange loop, we're missing the point. The Tao that can be spoken is not
the eternal Tao. As soon as we define something, we have actually missed describing what
it really is because we cannot describe the paradox as not really existing.
And so what we need to do is describe the paradox
in terms of paradox to allow for paradox which is what current mathematical thinking does
not allow for. That's why when we have inverse functions in trigonometry we limit them to
one cycle so they will not violate the definition of a function. We must violate the
definition of a function in order to have a viable system that describes both sides. In
fact from a mental perspective, there can be no such thing as a particle and no such thing
as a wave. There has to be something inside, internal that generates a view as a particle
when seen from our spatial perspective and as a wave when seen from out temporal
perspective. The particle would be the mass and the wave would be the energy.
What we have created in Mental Relativity is such a
model whereby we can not hold all of it in our minds at a single time. It is impossible.
And when we hold as much as we can from a spatial perspective, we see it as a structure
and we see particles. When we hold as much as we can from a temporal perspective we see
energy and we see waves. So in fact we do not have any energy or any mass that exists in
Mental Relativity, only an appreciation we call energy, an appreciation we call mass when
we look at it from one side or the other. But, the paradox itself is now created in our
model. That paradox is the internal equivalent of the external concept we call a photon.
Externally a photon is the object we see as both being a particle and a wave. In fact it
is not a particle and a wave. It is seen as a particle or a wave, but the reality of it is
neither particle nor wave but something else of which one spatial slice looks like
particles and one temporal slice looks like waves.
The Photon is a quantum. Inside the mind we have
the equivalent of the quantum which we call a quallum. And a quallum, as opposed to being
a quivering mass of probability externally is an equivalent quivering mass of potentiality
inside. We're dealing with the process equivalence of external quantum theory. And with
quallum theory we look at an object called the thoton.
The thoton then is something that can neither be
seen solely as space, nor as time -- it can either be seen either as space or as time. You
can either see it as a structure or you can see it as a mechanism. But whether you're
looking at it as state or process you're really missing the boat because there's something
inside that is generating both of those views but is really neither of those views. So it
is not that it is both space and time, but it is something else other than space and time,
sitting at the middle. In fact what it is is Mass-Energy.
Just as externally we see energy and mass and space
and time are created inside to project them externally, we create space-time as the
space-time continuum. When we look inside and see the thoton at work, and see that it has
a spatial side and a temporal side then we have to blend mass and energy and come up with
Mass-Energy which is the existence internally of a constant. Space-time, externally
generates the constant of the speed of light which is why e=mc squared, - we take that
constant times itself, rather than dividing it into the two halves of space and time and
seeing that it is really the spatial aspect of light times the temporal aspect of light,
or wavelength times frequency--space times time.
When we look at wavelength times frequency, because
of the fact that the two are blended together in the external universe, when one goes up
the other goes down and in effect we're just looking at the speed of light regardless of
how we measure it spatially or temporally and square it.
Internally we end up with Mass-Energy where it
doesn't really matter if we look at mass going up or energy going down, the two seem tied
together. The reason they're tied together is because mass and energy generate dimension.
And the dimensions of the mind that we're talking about is how many different levels,
fractal or frictal we can contain in our minds at one time. All we can actually hold are
three, that's why we see three dimensions and the fourth dimension is one that we can only
synthesize. That's the one that we stand on and we're trying to figure out what it looks
like under our feet when we look at the three dimensions externally.
So inside, since the two are tied together in
Mass-Energy, the constant is not the speed of light as it is externally, it is the size of
Mind. And as a demonstration of this you can imagine losing track of the fourth thing
after you've seen the third. These experiments, when you look at how many things you can
remember (7 plus or minus 2 single items in short term memory according to psychology) is
not dealing with the proper number of dimensions the way dimensions really work. When we
talk about creating a quad-helix in Mental Relativity as opposed to a double helix in DNA,
we're not talking about four things that exist in the same moment of space-time, we're
talking about one thing that is applied to the next, then another is applied to the
product of those two and another is applied to the product of the third with the first
two. So we end up with a progression where one thing is multiplied by another, is
multiplied by another, is multiplied by another, and at the end we end up with our
complete recursive cycle of going as far as we can before we have looped over the place we
were in our original space-time, externally, or mass-energy, internally.
The way this works is by looking at a spiral, and
to take the formula for a spiral which is a third dimensional appreciation that when seen
from its end appears to be a circle and recursive; when seen from the side appears to be a
sine-wave and open. Therefore it creates a particle from one view and a wave form from
another. If we take this spiral and we look at it from a three quarter angle we can
clearly see that it moves through an extra dimension that it is not sufficient to describe
it as either a particle or a wave, in fact it is neither a particle nor wave but is
something in between the two that generates those two perspectives. Now if we take that as
our essential concept of the spiral and we take the formula for the spiral and multiply it
by the formula for a spiral and multiply that by the formula for a spiral, and multiply
that by the formula for a spiral we've gone through all four dimensions and we end up with
something at the end that looks like exactly what we started with at the beginning. In
other words, we take a spiral and while it's spiraling we spiral the spiral, and then we
spiral the spiral that spiraled the spiraled, and then we spiral the spiral that spiraled
the spiral that spiraled the spiral.
Now we can only go through three dimensions of that
which we can follow. And the example is to look at a piece of rope. If we take fibers that
are going to make twine, and we see the fibers as creating a spiral, we can clearly see
them spiraling along the linearity of the twine. Then if we take that linearity of the
twine we've created and actually coil it, we can see that there is a spiral moving around
the twine and at the same time we've created a coil which is another spiral, so there is a
spiral within the spiral. Then if we take that spiral we've made of a coil and stretch it
out like a slinky and then we spiral the entire slinky around, we can see that there's a
spiral on the linearity of the twine, then a spiral that is created by coiling that
linearity, and then a spiral when we wrap the entire coil in a spiral fashion. Now, if we
try and move one farther dimension and take that coil that's moving in a spiral of the
coil that was made of the twine that has a spiral going along its linearity and spiral
that, we cannot hold all that in our mind at the same time. The minute we try to achieve
an understanding of the larger spiral we lose track of the lower spiral. As a result, we
can only see three dimensions at once, not four. And because of that, we have a three
dimension band width of the mind in a sense that that becomes the size of mind constant is
No matter how far we move up in our considerations
to look at higher fractal levels or frictal levels, or no matter how far down we go to see
greater detail, we can not see any broader of scope than three dimensions of it at a time.
But that little box-car moves up and down the track of thought describing the number of
ties that our mind covers, which is three dimensions worth.
But we can move up and we can move down; we can
move to greater detail, we can move to larger, broader perspective, but we'll never see
more than three dimensions at the same time and that is a psychological--well not exactly
a proof, but kind of a proof of concept of the size of mind as appearing to be a constant.
Therefore this would be true of those who were exceptional as well as those who were
geniuses, it really doesn't matter, you're still going to see three dimensions or you
can't be self aware. The real question is how far can you move on the track upward and how
far can you move on the track downward before you lose track.