 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Chapter 1 - The Story Mind 1.8
Writing Remakes What happens if you mess up
and just alter part of a structure without considering the structure-wide impact
that change may have? Here’s an example…. Consider the Bill Murray
film, "Scrooged:" (a remake of Dickens’ "A Christmas
Carol") as opposed to "Scrooge" (the 1951 version of the story
starring Alistair Simm). In the Simm version,
Scrooge goes about business in the usual English fashion, but lacks generosity.
That is illustrated by his refusal to donate to charity, his lack of
consideration for Bob Cratchett’s family’s plight, and statements about the
poor such as, "If they would rather die, then they should do so and
decrease the surplus population." Though some of this
continues to exist in the In the Simm movie, Scrooge,
the ghost bombard him with visions of those he hurt because he might have helped
yet did not. Even in the first act, Marley’s ghost laments that he and his ilk
are doomed to wander the earth, witnessing those who need help but being unable
to intercede. In the In the Simm story (as in
Dickens’ original), the Ghost of Christmas Present confronts him with two
waifs named Ignorance (lack of education) and Want (lack of what
is needed). This drives how the point that it is a lack of action from
which Scrooge suffers. The same arguments are made
to Bill Murray’s character. But when he finally changes, it seems a bit
hollow. It feels somewhat unmotivated and trite. Don’t get me wrong, I
love the film. But wouldn’t it have been far more satisfying at an emotional
level if the argument had matched the problem that needed to be resolved. If the writers of "Scrooged"
had wanted to update the story by making the lead character more proactively
villainous, then they should have changed the arguments made by the ghosts as
well. Instead of showing Ignorance and Want, they might have shown Defeat and
Suffering. These would be the children of the Murray-Scrooge character’s
actions – victims of his mean-spiritedness, and a truth with which he could
not quibble. As you can see, structure
and storytelling are intimately acquainted, yet are two different creatures.
Storytelling can be altered at (as George W. Bush said) "The whim of a
hat." But structure cannot be made mincemeat, willy nilly. No sir!
Structure must remain balanced, in symmetry, and if one aspect is changed, then
care must be given to ensure that all other affected parts of the structure
(directly or indirectly) must be appropriately adjusted as well.
*Try either or both for 90 days. Not working for you? Return for a full refund of your purchase price! About Dramatica and StoryWeaver Hi, I'm Melanie Anne Phillips, creator of StoryWeaver, co-creator of Dramatica and owner of Storymind.com. If you have a moment, I'd like to tell you about these two story development tools - what each is designed to do, how each works alone on a different part of story development and how they can be used together to cover the entire process from concept to completion of your novel or screenplay. What They Do Dramatica is a tool to help you build a perfect story structure. StoryWeaver is a tool to help you build your story's world. Dramatica focuses on the underlying logic of your story, making sure there are no holes or inconsistencies. StoryWeaver focuses on the creative process, boosting your inspiration and guiding it to add depth, detail and passion to your story. How They Do It Dramatica has the world's only patented interactive Story Engine™ which cross-references your answers to questions about your dramatic intent, then finds any weaknesses in your structure and even suggests the best ways to strengthen them. StoryWeaver uses a revolutionary new creative format as you follow more than 200 Story Cards™ step by step through the story development process. You'll design the people who'll inhabit your story's world, what happens to them, and what it all means. How They Work Alone By itself Dramatic appeals to structural writers who like to work out all the details of their stories logically before they write a word. By itself, StoryWeaver appeals to intuitive writers who like to follow their Muse and develop their stories as they go. How They Work Together But, the finished work of a structural writer can often lack passion, which is where StoryWeaver can help. And the finished work of an intuitive writer can often lack direction, which is where Dramatica can help. So, while each kind of writer will find one program or the other the most initially appealing, both kinds of writers can benefit from both programs. Try Either Program Risk Free! We have a 90 Day Return Policy here at Storymind. Try either or both of these products and if you aren't completely satisfied we'll cheerfully refund your purchase price.
|
|
|
Contact Us - About Us - Lowest Price Guarantee - Shipping - Return Policy - Bonus Package Copyright Melanie Anne Phillips - Owner, Storymind.com, Creator Storyweaver, Co-creator Dramatica |
Format:
Windows / Mac CD-ROM
